Material Characterization with the Fuzzy Theory of Particleboards Bonded by Urea Formaldehyde with Nanofillers

Authors

  • Ömer Ümit Yalçın Isparta University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Industrial Engineering, 32040, Isparta, Turkey
  • Uğur Özkan Isparta University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Industrial Engineering, 32040, Isparta, Turkey https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0147-9976
  • Deniz Aydemir Bartin University, Faculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Industrial Engineering, 74100, Bartın, Turkey
  • Ahmet Öztel Bartin University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Management, 74100, Bartın, Turkey
  • Yafes Yıldız Bartin University, Faculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Engineering, 74100, Bartın, Turkey

Keywords:

Particleboards, Nano fillers, Mechanical characterization, Titanium dioxide, Fuzzy theory

Abstract

This study investigated the material characterization with the fuzzy theory of particleboards bonded by urea formaldehyde with nanofillers including nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) and titanium dioxide (TiO2). The density, water absorption, thickness swelling, and mechanical tests (which included flexure and internal bonding strength tests) were considered. The fuzzy sets theory addressed the ambiguity and subjectivity of language using triangular fuzzy numbers to assess the interests of decision maker’s (DMs). The addition of nanofillers slightly decreased water absorption values due to possible good interactions between nanofillers and urea formaldehyde. Thickness swelling ranged from 0.4 to 17.5%, and water absorption ranged from 0.4 to 10.7% compared to the control sample. The physical properties of the samples were generally improved by urea formaldehyde with NFC/TiO2, and the densities of the test panels were found to be similar. The modulus of rupture of the panels with urea formaldehyde with nanofillers were under the EN 312 standard’s requirements, and the highest flexural strength and flexural modulus of elasticity were 11.1 and 1.3 GPa, respectively. Internal bond values were between 0.55 and 0.89 MPa. According to EDAS method rankings, 2C2T-8 was the best material, followed by 2C1T-8 and 2C-8. The samples coded with Control-4 and Control-8 were the lowest-performing materials.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-22

Issue

Section

Research Article or Brief Communication